University of San Jose-Recoletos
———————————————————————————————————————
Literature
Performance Task
———————————————————————————————————————
Boy Talk (Short Film, 2024)
written by Cyrene Joyce Laurente and Bryan Nonay
Group 1 Members
Leader: Edheljaine Czhyril Abapo
Junellah Martha Antipuesto
Jairus dwayne Bacarro
Gian Josh Atacador
11-Bl. Anselm of Polanco
Submitted to:
Ms. Mencae Marae Sapid
September 20, 2024
———————————————————————————————————————
Introduction
An intriguing short film called Boy Talk discusses different aspects of male relationships and how society treats women. The film, which was authored by Bryan Nonay and Cyrene Joyce Laurente, presents an original viewpoint on the problem of rape through the strange bond between a young college student and an old man.
Boy Talk is a current film that centers on the lives of two very different generations. As their seemingly routine talks about women deepen to expose more serious underlying problems, they challenge beliefs and social norms. The purpose of the movie is to start vital conversations about consent, masculinity, and the widespread issue of sexual assault.
Summary
Cyrene Joyce Laurente and Bryan Nonay have written a short film in 2024 called "Boy Talk," explores the complexities of masculinity through an unlikely conversation between an older man and a college boy. As they discuss women and their experiences, the film delves into the unspoken pressures and expectations surrounding male identity. The dialogue reveals the generational gap in understanding, prompting both characters to re-evaluate their perspectives on relationships, societal norms, and the impact of rap culture on their views of women. Through this intimate exchange, "Boy Talk" challenges traditional notions of masculinity and encourages a deeper understanding of the complexities of human connection.
ANALYSES
Biographical
The short film “Boy Talk” represents how some men have a broken mindset of stereotyping girls as inanimate objects to possess and satisfy their pleasure. The uncle himself has multiple fallacies in his perspective towards women. His perceptions and views towards them are extremely fragmented to the point where I call him a misogynistic sexist individual. He commenced the conversation with a discomforting approach of treating young women as a variety of dishes that needs to be tasted to quench the starving pleasure before they come to an age. He also had the audacity to compare women to cars where he could allow himself to do test drives and the more quantity he tests the more satisfying his life will accomplish as a carefree teenager. Convincing his nephew to tolerate this kind of mindset is the turning point of the short film. It revealed how his shameless hypocrisy made our society dangerous for all women. The fact that he further addressed that his niece and other women should not dress revealing clothes because there are lots of maniac guys coming for them, boils my blood as he tolerates a victim-blaming mindset that blames women for wearing such clothes and proposing false accusations that they beg for it, showing how the way they are dressed. He implied that they should idolize and follow the decent lifestyle of Maria Clara but still, she was raped. This conveys that the women are not the problem of our society but the men who keep this dirty mindset of attempting to interrupt women’s privacy without content and satisfying their pleasure leaving women traumatized for their whole life. Well, in fact, women have their own freedom to wear what they want, and empowering them should be held, not treating them as inferior people. They have the capabilities to surpass men, lead nations, and bring optimistic changes to our society. The short film addressed the rampant issues of women’s rights in our society. It helps us open our eyes to value every woman’s privacy and participate in organizations and movements that protect their will of living, and their right to enjoy their life without overthinking from dangers of men.
Linguistics
We people should not judge or change what people do wear because it will sexualize them. We should change because we are human beings, we control ourselves to not sexualize other people. And now days there are a lot of people who sexualize people based on what they are wearing, and some people said that it is people who adjust from what they are wearing to not be sexualized, but that is not true. People should not judge or change what people do wear because it will sexualize them. We should change because we are human beings we control ourselves to not sexualize other people. And now days there are a lot of people who sexualize people based on what they are wearing, and some people said that it is people who adjust from what they are wearing to not be sexualized, but that is not true. People should be the ones who adjust not to sexualize people because it is against the law not to sexualize people around you.
Sociocultural
Boy Talk (2024) is a short film about an old man and a college boy who talk about women. Their conversation made them realize on the issue of rape. Written by Cyrene Joyce Laurente and Bryan Nonay, the film focuses on a conversation between an uncle and his nephew. The uncle tries to enforce traditional, macho ideas about masculinity, like encouraging his nephew to get multiple girlfriends and blaming women for sexual harassment.
The nephew, however, represents a younger, more progressive mindset, pushing back against these harmful ideas. The film shows how these everyday conversations between men contribute to a culture that objectifies women and excuses male behavior, but also highlights hope for change as younger generations start challenging these toxic norms.
CONCLUSIONS
"Boy Talk" short film serves as a stark reminder of the devastating impact of rape and the urgent need for societal change. The film's exploration of the issue transcends simple awareness, delving into the complex interplay of societal norms, cultural influences, and individual perspectives that contribute to the problem. The characters' journey of self-discovery highlights the importance of critical thinking, empathy, fostering a culture of respect and accountability. While the film doesn't offer easy solutions, it provides a powerful platform for reflection and encourages viewers to engage in meaningful conversations that can contribute to positive change.
21st-Century-literature (CRITICAL ANALYSIS)
The short film explores the theme of masculinity and its impact on relationships and societal norms. It uses the conversation between the old man and the young boy to highlight how different generations view masculinity and how these views can lead to misunderstandings and harmful behaviors. It shows that traditional notions of masculinity can be limiting and can perpetuate harmful biases about women. It also suggests that by engaging in open and honest conversations, we can begin to challenge these prejudices and create a more respectful and equitable society.
The old man represents a traditional view of masculinity, while the young boy represents a more modern perspective. The conflict between them arises from their different views on women and their roles in society. The main conflict in the film is the tension between the old man's traditional views and the young boy's more progressive outlook. This conflict is further amplified by their differing experiences with women and their understanding of rape. The film uses the setting of a car, which is often associated with masculinity, to symbolize the limitations of traditional masculinity. The car's movement can also be seen as a metaphor for the characters' journeys of self-discovery
The film is set in a car, which creates a sense of intimacy and allows the characters to have a more personal conversation. The car's movement also creates a sense of urgency and
tension, as the characters are forced to confront their differences. The setting of the car allows the characters to have a conversation that they might not have had in a different setting. The car's movement also allows the film to explore the themes of masculinity and societal norms in a more dynamic way. The setting of the car creates a sense of confinement, which amplifies the conflict between the characters. The car's movement also symbolizes the characters' struggles to break free from traditional expectations.
The young boy's worldview changes throughout the film as he begins to understand the impact of traditional masculinity on his own life and the lives of others. The conversation with the old man, as well as the film's exploration of the issue of rape, prompts the young boy to re-evaluate his own beliefs and attitudes.
In Boy Talk (2024), the protagonist and antagonist have different motives. The protagonist wants to avoid peer pressure to appear tough and remain true to who he is. He wants more open and honest conversations. On the other hand the antagonist keeps up the traditional view of gender. The conflict shows the struggle between being yourself and following what others expect.
As a reader, my initial response to Boy Talk was one of intrigue and reflection. I appreciated how the story tackled important themes like peer pressure, toxic masculinity, and the search for personal identity. This story was interesting and relatable since it showed young male handling challenging social expectations in a genuine way. All in all, I found the novel to be quite insightful in its analysis of these topics, and it made me reflect on the difficulties of remaining true to oneself in a culture that frequently favors conformity.
Themes from Boy Talk relate to how we live in a different generation now that supports individuality and openness. The protagonist concerns traditional views of masculinity, reflecting today's generation's disregard of cultural norms.
Boy Talk shows how young men are still pressured to follow old ideas about being tough and hiding emotions. But it also reflects that we’re now in a different generation with changing beliefs. The protagonist represents the shift toward being yourself, while the antagonist holds onto outdated ideas. The story highlights the struggle between fitting in and staying true to who you are. It shows that these old ideas can hurt relationships and stop real connections. In today’s world, where we talk more about gender, identity, and mental health, Boy Talk suggests that embracing new beliefs can create a more accepting society.
PHILOSOPHY
1. What current events/issues are embedded in the literary text?
Using the uncle Tito as a focal point, Wonderlast Films' short film "Boy Talk" addresses the ubiquitous problem of sexual assault culture. First and foremost, Tito personifies the destructive practice of victim-blaming. His position, which is firmly based in conventional standards, highlights the perils of such viewpoints by upholding damaging stereotypes and impeding the development of a society where women are safer. By emphasizing women's conduct and attire as potential triggers for rape, his informal talks exploit women. This unjustly shifts the weight of accountability onto victims while ignoring the fundamental reality that rapists bear only partial blame for their acts. The urgent need to refocus attention on bringing offenders accountable is emphasized throughout the movie. This displays a strong message that such behavior is unacceptable while also safeguarding survivors.
2. What are your personal philosophical reflections about the current events/issues in your given literary text?
Boy Talk offers a thorough examination of masculinity, identity, and communication. The conflict between emotional vulnerability and conventional masculine norms lies at the heart of the movie. It raises important concerns regarding the effects of repressing emotions and how boys interactions are shaped by society norms. The protagonists, who deal with peer pressure while forming their identities, represent existentialist ideas about authenticity. Their travels bring to light the difficulty of balancing one's genuine self with socially prescribed duties, posing philosophical questions about what it means to live truly. One major issue that shows the complexity of devotion and self-worth is friendship. Aristotle and other philosophers stress the importance of friendship in moral growth, and the movie looks at how these relationships affect the protagonists' identities. Furthermore, "Boy Talk" challenges cultural conceptions of masculinity by discussing Judith Butler's theory of gender as
ORAL COMMUNICATION: FOSTERING CULTURAL DIVERSITY
The film is set in the Philippines, which is explicitly mentioned. This implies a cultural context that informs the characters' interactions and the overall message. While the text doesn't directly quote dialogue from the film, it mentions the uncle's attempt to "man up" his nephew, which signifies a cultural concept of masculinity. This suggests that the film utilizes language that is specific to Filipino culture and values. The text uses general terms like "Filipino culture" and "toxic masculinity," which could be interpreted as making broad generalizations about an entire culture.
By focusing on the harmful effects of toxic masculinity, the film implicitly challenges about Filipino men and their behavior. It encourages viewers to consider the diverse range of experiences and perspectives within Filipino culture. The film's strong message and thought-provoking content can initiate discussions about gender equality and the importance of respecting diverse cultural perspectives. This can lead to greater understanding and appreciation of different cultural values and practices
Interactions between characters from different backgrounds could foster empathy and understanding, demonstrating that despite cultural differences, we share common values and experiences. This could contribute to the film's broader message of promoting inclusivity and social justice.
CLF 1:
Genesis 1:27: “So God created mankind in his image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them.” The film likely shows characters who hold harmful biases about women, neglecting to acknowledge their intrinsic value and dignity as being made in the likeness of God. This could be a central conflict in the film, as the characters grapple with the realization that their views are not aligned with God's design.
A character reflects on Genesis 1:27, or the film uses imagery that suggests the inherent worth and dignity of all people. Even if the film doesn't explicitly state this idea, it might implicitly explore it through the characters actions and realizations. For example, if the characters begin to treat women with more respect and empathy, it could suggest a shift in their understanding of human equality. Some characters hold traditional views about gender roles, while others challenge those views. This could create a conflict that forces the characters to confront their beliefs and consider a more inclusive understanding of humanity.
This passage emphasizes that both men and women are created in God's image, possessing inherent dignity and worth. It challenges harmful biases that might devalue women or portray them as objects rather than individuals. The film could use this passage to show characters realizing that their previous views were based on false assumptions and to encourage them to see women as equal partners in God's creation. This realization could lead them to treat women with the respect and care they deserve.
Promoting Respect and Consent by recognizing that women are created in God's image, the film could encourage characters to treat them with respect and to understand the importance of consent in any relationship. This passage could help them see that sexual violence violates the inherent dignity of a woman and is a sin against God.
No comments:
Post a Comment